Reviewed September 7, 2026.
Construction contract disputes in Albany and throughout New York often begin with an unpaid balance, a disagreement about scope, delay, defective work or a termination. A clear agreement and contemporaneous project records help explain the parties’ obligations, but neither eliminates every dispute.
Common triggers
- Payment: unpaid invoices, withheld retainage, backcharges, disputed extras or disagreement about whether payment conditions were met.
- Scope and performance: conflicting plans, exclusions, quality requirements, incomplete work or changes directed without an agreed price.
- Delay: access problems, design decisions, material deliveries, trade coordination or disagreement about which event affected completion.
- Termination or suspension: contested default, alleged abandonment, failure to provide notice or an opportunity to cure, and disputes over completion costs or earned payment.
Identify the contract provision and the evidence relevant to each claim. A payment withheld because of alleged defects presents different proof questions from an unpaid approved invoice, even if both concern the same project.
Breach of contract and fraud are different claims
A contract claim addresses an alleged failure to perform an enforceable obligation. Fraud requires separate legal elements, including a qualifying misrepresentation, reliance and resulting loss; merely describing poor performance as intentional does not necessarily create a separate fraud claim.
In Michael Davis Construction, Inc. v 129 Parsonage Lane, LLC (2021), the Second Department upheld dismissal of a fraud counterclaim that duplicated the contractual dispute. The alleged representation, independent duties, reliance and damages must be examined on the actual facts. Construction litigation can also involve liens, bonds, trust funds, warranty, statutory and other claims; it is not limited to contract and fraud.
Document changes and notices as the work proceeds
State who may authorize changes, what approval is required, and how price and time adjustments are determined. Use the required written change process and preserve instructions, daily reports, photographs, delivery records, schedules and correspondence.
A contract prohibiting oral modification raises issues under General Obligations Law § 15-301. Do not assume every field conversation creates an enforceable change, or that the absence of a signed change order resolves every dispute. Counsel should review the wording, communications and conduct. Covered home-improvement agreements also have statutory writing requirements.
Review the complete contract before escalation
Examine the scope and document hierarchy; billing and withholding rules; claim notices; time extensions; indemnity and insurance; default and cure; termination; limitations on remedies; and the selected dispute forum. Check bonds and incorporated prime-contract terms where applicable.
Before stopping work, terminating a participant or filing suit, assess the required notice and cure steps and the consequences for payment, site safety, property and sureties. If urgent protective work is necessary, document the conditions and obtain advice about the appropriate procedure.
Choose a proportionate response
Preserve evidence and identify court, lien, bond and contract deadlines first. Then reconcile the accounting and evaluate defenses, counterclaims, available security and likely collection. A demand, negotiation, mediation, arbitration or lawsuit should follow from that assessment and the governing agreement.
Contract litigation does not automatically preserve a mechanic’s lien. Filing, service, continuation and foreclosure requirements require separate attention. Likewise, a settlement should address the claims actually being resolved, payment, releases, lien or bond treatment and any continuing obligations.
Kushnick Pallaci PLLC handles construction litigation, delay and change-order disputes, and construction contract review. Contact 631-752-7100 or vtp@kushnicklaw.com.
Attorney Advertising. General information, not legal advice.
No comments:
Post a Comment